Skip to content

Keep effective model and effort history in conversations - #1948

Open
currentbits wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
coder/next-feature-1927
Open

currentbits wants to merge 10 commits into
mainfrom
coder/next-feature-1927

Conversation

@currentbits

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Changing model or reasoning effort left no reliable record in a conversation, and historical footers could follow the current picker instead of the run that produced the message.

Persist the effective provider/model/effort when a run is dispatched or a live model switch takes effect. Render deduplicated boundaries and retain assistant attribution across reload and paged history. Queued prompts are stamped at dispatch, live steering retains its current run, and failed launches remove provisional markers. Claude effort comes from resolved launch arguments, including Ultracode's xhigh override. Unknown provider defaults and internal Ask/workflow selections remain explicitly unknown/default rather than being guessed.

Validation: 96 and 44 focused Electron tests, 221 history/plan/renderer tests, typecheck and preload synchronization passed. The follow-up Ultracode regression run passed 27 tests with one existing Windows-only skip. Independent review confirmed the Ultracode fix and reran 23 focused tests with no material findings. No real-provider smoke test was performed.

Closes #1927. Part of #1926.

Created with GPT-6.1 Sol in Codex, including GPT-6.1 Sol implementation and review workers.

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 8, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-08T10:57:42.570478Z 03fc2f8 PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 03fc2f8240

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/components/ThreadView.tsx Resolved

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Model and effort changes in the transcript

1 participant